Open concept · A digital euro for the local economy

The kuna is back. This time as a euro.

Croatia's oldest means of payment becomes its newest — a regulated euro stablecoin, backed 1:1 by the euro. Here is why that matters, and why today's system works against the local economy.

"From fur to code."
Three lives of one kuna

A currency named after value, not after money

"Kuna" is the Croatian word for the pine marten. In the Middle Ages marten fur was money — the "marturina" tax was paid in pelts. The kuna has been a means of payment in these lands for a thousand years.

1994

Born with the state

On 30 May 1994 the kuna became the official currency of the young Croatia. On the coins: a nightingale, a tuna, a bear.

2023

Withdrawn

On 1 January 2023 Croatia adopted the euro at a rate of 7.53450 kn = €1. The farewell was an emotional one.

Reborn

Now the kuna comes back as a digital euro — the name people love, the value they count on: 1 KUNA = 1 EUR.

Stablecoins in one minute

What is a stablecoin, anyway?

A stablecoin is a digital token whose value is pegged 1:1 to real money — here, to the euro. It is not speculation: for every token in circulation there is one euro in reserve, and you can redeem the token back into euros at par at any time. The difference from the number in your bank account? A stablecoin is programmable, transferable in a second, 24/7, without intermediaries — and transparent on a public chain.

~$27.6 trillion
settled in stablecoins in 2024 — more than Visa and Mastercard combined
1 : 1
every regulated euro stablecoin is backed by a euro in reserve
24/7
settlement in seconds, no bank opening hours and no borders
First, understand money

Banks do not lend out your savings

Contrary to the textbook: when a bank grants a loan it creates new money — by crediting the borrower's account. Loans create deposits. It is estimated that around 97% of the money in circulation came into being exactly that way (Bank of England, 2014).

flowchart LR A[Bank grants a loan]:::bank --> B[(A NEW deposit appears
in the borrower's account)]:::new B --> C[Money enters the economy]:::flow C --> D{Whoever decides on credit,
decides what gets built}:::key classDef bank fill:#002F6C,stroke:#001631,color:#fff,font-weight:600; classDef new fill:#C8912A,stroke:#9a6f1f,color:#fff,font-weight:600; classDef flow fill:#EAF0FA,stroke:#9aa9c2,color:#14202E; classDef key fill:#fff,stroke:#C8912A,color:#002F6C,font-weight:600;
The power to create money = the power to allocate credit. The only question is who holds it, and for whose benefit.
The simplest example

Where the interest goes: a story about a brick

Three neighbours, one bank (foreign-owned). The brick was made locally, the money circulated between neighbours — but the interest permanently leaves the community.

flowchart LR BANK["Bank
foreign owner"]:::out -- "1 · loan EUR 10,000" --> KUPAC["Brick buyer"]:::loc KUPAC -- "2 · pays EUR 10,000" --> PROIZ["Brick maker"]:::loc PROIZ -- "3 · deposit EUR 10,000" --> BANK KUPAC -- "4 · 10 instalments = ~EUR 12,950" --> BANK BANK -. "5 · ~EUR 2,950 interest out" .-> X((Abroad)):::out classDef loc fill:#fff,stroke:#002F6C,color:#002F6C,font-weight:600; classDef out fill:#C0181C,stroke:#7a1418,color:#fff,font-weight:600;
A €10,000 loan at 5% over 10 years → ~€12,950 is repaid. A clean ~€2,950 of interest goes to the bank's foreign owner.

Multiply that by thousands of loans and you see the scale of the outflow. The higher the rate and the longer the term, the more value leaves the community.

Problem

An extractive economy

When credit decisions and profit accumulation are centralised outside the country, locally created value systematically leaves. Croatia's banking sector is almost entirely foreign-owned — and the profit travels to the parent company.

~90%
of banking assets in Croatia are foreign-owned
>€3bn
of dividends paid to foreign owners 2022–2024 — ~98% taken out of the country
€1.53bn
record banking sector profit in 2024 (Croatian National Bank)
flowchart TB S([Savers and businesses in Croatia]):::loc --> BANK[Bank in Croatia]:::bank BANK -- loans, interest, fees --> PROFIT[Locally created profit]:::gold PROFIT -- dividend --> PARENT[Foreign parent
Italy · Austria · Hungary]:::out PARENT -. capital leaves the local economy .-> X((Abroad)):::out classDef loc fill:#fff,stroke:#002F6C,color:#002F6C,font-weight:600; classDef bank fill:#002F6C,stroke:#001631,color:#fff,font-weight:600; classDef gold fill:#C8912A,stroke:#9a6f1f,color:#fff,font-weight:600; classDef out fill:#C0181C,stroke:#7a1418,color:#fff,font-weight:600;
Local liquidity is created here — and the multiplier is lost when the profit goes abroad.
Who holds your money

Six banks, five foreign parents

The largest banks in Croatia and where their profit travels. Domestic (state) ownership is the exception, not the rule.

BankParentOwnershipMarket shareProfit goes…
Zagrebačka bankaUniCreditItaly~25.6%~€431m to parent
Privredna banka Zagreb (PBZ)Intesa SanpaoloItaly~20.5%~€371m to parent
Erste & SteiermärkischeErste GroupAustria~18.1%~€120m to parent
OTP bankaOTP GroupHungary~10.1%~€75m to parent
Raiffeisenbank (RBA)RaiffeisenAustria~8.1%~€70m to parent
Hrvatska poštanska banka (HPB)Republic of CroatiaCroatia~9.4%stays in Croatia
Sector total~88.9% foreign-owned~€2bn out over 18 months

Sources: Croatian National Bank / HUB, N1, Bloomberg Adria, Telegram, NHS. Figures rounded; they refer to 2024 profit / 2025 payouts and the 2023–2024 aggregate.

Who actually earns

The chain does not stop at the "foreign parent"

The interest and fees you pay your bank travel via Milan and Turin all the way to a Wall Street fund — and to a 460-year-old foundation.

flowchart TD KLIJENT(["Client in Croatia"]):::loc --> ZABA["Zagrebačka banka"]:::bank KLIJENT --> PBZ["Privredna banka Zagreb"]:::bank ZABA -- "96.2%" --> UC["UniCredit · Italy"]:::out PBZ -- "100%" --> IS["Intesa Sanpaolo · Italy"]:::out UC --> BR1["BlackRock 7.38% · USA"]:::own UC --> NB1["Norges Bank 3.01% · Norway"]:::own UC --> CRT["Fondazione CRT 2.29%
a 19th-century savings bank"]:::own IS --> CSP["Compagnia di San Paolo 6.63%
founded 1563"]:::own IS --> CARI["Fondazione Cariplo 5.52%
founded 1823"]:::own IS --> BR2["BlackRock ~5% · USA"]:::own classDef loc fill:#fff,stroke:#002F6C,color:#002F6C,font-weight:600; classDef bank fill:#002F6C,stroke:#001631,color:#fff,font-weight:600; classDef out fill:#C0181C,stroke:#7a1418,color:#fff,font-weight:600; classDef own fill:#F4E7C6,stroke:#C8912A,color:#3a2900,font-weight:600;
BlackRock and Vanguard hold shares on behalf of clients (pension funds, savings). The Italian foundations fund cultural projects in Italy — partly out of profit made in Croatia.

Sources: UniCredit / Intesa Sanpaolo IR; simplywall.st; Wikipedia (Compagnia di San Paolo 1563, Cariplo 1823).

How we got here

Paid for them, sold them, and now pay again

Taxpayers bailed out the banks, the state sold them for less than the bailout cost, and foreign owners have extracted profit ever since.

flowchart LR A["1991–2002
BAILOUT
~USD 5.5bn
23% of GDP"]:::out --> B["1999–2002
PRIVATISATION
sold for
~EUR 1–1.5bn"]:::bank B --> C["2003–2024
EXTRACTION
>EUR 10bn
of profit out"]:::out B -. "had it been invested
in the S&P 500" .-> E(("≈ EUR 8.2bn
today")):::gold classDef out fill:#C0181C,stroke:#7a1418,color:#fff,font-weight:600; classDef bank fill:#002F6C,stroke:#001631,color:#fff,font-weight:600; classDef gold fill:#C8912A,stroke:#9a6f1f,color:#fff,font-weight:600;
The number of banks fell from 60 (1997) to ~20 (2025). Had the proceeds of the 4 key sales been invested in the S&P 500, they would be worth ~€8.2bn today.

Sources: Croatian National Bank, State Agency for Deposit Insurance; inflation and S&P 500 values rounded to 2025/2026.

Two models, one difference

Where the value stays

This is not about banks being "evil". It is about where liquidity accumulates — and who controls the monetary infrastructure.

The centralised system

ZABA/UniCredit · PBZ/Intesa · Erste · OTP · RBA…
  • Credit decisions and profit centralised outside the country
  • Dividends systematically go to the foreign parent
  • An opaque system, opening hours, intermediaries
  • The customer cannot see where or how their money "works"
  • Slow cross-border transfers and fees

A euro stablecoin (1:1)

the airKUNA model · reserve under control, on-chain
  • Reserve 100% backed in euro, redemption at par
  • The reserve can sit in an ethical bank that channels it into local lending
  • Transparent on a public chain — anyone can verify the backing
  • Settlement in a second, 24/7, borderless, programmable
  • Value and payment margins can stay in the domestic economy
Who this helps

A creator in Croatia loses 15–40%

The concrete face of the problem: when you collect a subscription or a donation, every intermediary takes a cut. On micro amounts that exceeds half.

flowchart LR P(["Patron pays EUR 1.00"]):::loc --> PF["−10% platform
EUR 0.90"]:::out PF --> PR["−processing
EUR 0.75"]:::out PR --> K(["Creator keeps
EUR 0.75"]):::out K -. "same amount on-chain" .-> SOL(["euro on-chain
fee ~EUR 0.00025"]):::gold classDef loc fill:#fff,stroke:#002F6C,color:#002F6C,font-weight:600; classDef out fill:#C0181C,stroke:#7a1418,color:#fff,font-weight:600; classDef gold fill:#C8912A,stroke:#9a6f1f,color:#fff,font-weight:600;
A quarter of every €1 donation disappears in fees. An on-chain euro charges a fraction of a cent — so the value stays with the creator.
%

15–40% in fees

platforms (Patreon 10%), card processing and currency conversion together eat a large share of a creator's revenue.

~€28–33bn

the value of the EU creator-economy segment (2025); up to €135bn by 2032.

+

Merchant of Record

a regulated entity takes on VAT and compliance instead of the creator — no VAT filings across 27 countries.

Sources: Patreon Help Center; Stripe; Goldman Sachs; BNP Paribas. Solana fee: solana.com.

Cookbook

How to issue your own euro stablecoin

The recipe is no secret — the regulatory framework (MiCA) is clear and the technology is open source. Five steps from euro to token.

flowchart LR S1[1 · EMI licence]:::a --> S2[2 · Reserve +
safeguarding]:::a S2 --> S3[3 · Smart contract
mint / burn]:::b S3 --> S4[4 · SEPA
on/off-ramp]:::a S4 --> S5[5 · Right to redeem
at par]:::gold classDef a fill:#002F6C,stroke:#001631,color:#fff,font-weight:600; classDef b fill:#0A3B82,stroke:#001631,color:#fff,font-weight:600; classDef gold fill:#C8912A,stroke:#9a6f1f,color:#fff,font-weight:600;
Five steps to a regulated euro stablecoin (a MiCA e-money token).
1

E-money licence (EMI)

The issuer must be a licensed e-money institution (or partner with one). A licence in one EU/EEA state gives passporting across the whole EU and SEPA.

2

Reserve and safeguarding

One euro for every token. Funds are held segregated at a credit institution, in safe low-risk assets, with an independent audit and public attestations of backing.

3

Smart contract: mint and burn

A euro payment in → the contract mints a token; a redemption → the contract burns it. Compliance rules (KYC, limits, blacklists) are built into every transfer.

4

SEPA on/off-ramp

The token is tied to an IBAN: a SEPA payment to that IBAN automatically mints the token in the wallet; the exit returns euros over SEPA (ideally SEPA Instant).

5

The right to redeem at par

Any holder can exchange the token for euros 1:1 at any time. That is a regulatory requirement — and the main source of trust.

Not theory

Monerium already does this

The recipe is proven in production. EURe is a regulated euro stablecoin that has been running for years — airKUNA applies the same model in a Croatian and regional context.

Monerium EURe

StatusThe first e-money EMI on a blockchain (est. 2016)
RegulationMiCA e-money token (EMT)
IBAN / SEPAvia LHV Pank
ChainsEthereum, Gnosis, Polygon, Arbitrum, Base, Linea
Issued~€25m of regulated e-money
Scale and infrastructure

Tiny in volume — powerful in capability

EURe holds only ~€25m — about two millionths of all euro money in circulation. Yet that same euro, on-chain, travels for a fraction of a cent, settles in seconds and can be spent on a Visa card.

flowchart LR M1["Euro M1
~EUR 11,270,000m"]:::big -.-> EURE["EURe
~EUR 25m
≈ 2 millionths"]:::small EURE --> CAP["But: ~5 s settlement ·
fee a fraction of a cent ·
80M+ Visa locations"]:::cap classDef big fill:#002F6C,stroke:#001631,color:#fff,font-weight:600; classDef small fill:#C8912A,stroke:#9a6f1f,color:#fff,font-weight:600; classDef cap fill:#1A7A3C,stroke:#0c3f23,color:#fff,font-weight:600;
For every €1 in EURe there is ~€60,000 of paper euro — and yet EURe does everything cash cannot.

Gnosis Chain

The home chain for EURe. A fee of ~$0.001–0.01 per transaction, ~5 s blocks; gas is paid in a stablecoin (xDAI), so the cost is predictable.

Gnosis Pay

A self-custody Visa card that spends EURe directly at 80+ million Visa locations — the on-chain euro in real life.

Enormous headroom

All on-chain euro amounts to just ~€395m. The base is minimal, the capability proven — what is missing is a regional player.

Sources: CoinGecko / CoinMarketCap (EURe); ECB (euro M1/M3); Gnosis.io, Gnosisscan, Gnosis Pay.

Market and opportunity

The smallest segment — and the fastest growing

Euro stablecoins are less than 1% of the global market, but they exploded after MiCA. The regulatory gap is closed, and the space for a regional player is wide open.

$

>$280bn

total stablecoin market capitalisation (ECB, Nov 2025); ~8% of the crypto market.

~99% USD

of the market is dollar-denominated — the euro segment is just ~€395m, leaving enormous headroom.

$2 trillion

projected stablecoin market size by 2028 (ECB).

The CEE space

there is no dominant regional euro stablecoin. Whoever first connects SEPA and minting defines the standard.

Source: ECB Financial Stability Review 11/2025.

Business model

Treasury yield — like USDC and EURe

Reserves are held in interest-bearing, low-risk euro instruments. The yield on the reserve (treasury yield) is the primary source of revenue — and in a DAO model it can flow back into the community and local lending.

  • ·
    At Circle (USDC), ~94% of revenue comes from exactly this reserve yield.
  • ·
    Revenue scales linearly with token circulation.
  • ·
    The reserve can also be a stable deposit base for an ethical bank that channels it into the real economy.

Illustrative

Reserve (example)€25,000,000
Annual yield~2.5%
Annual amount to distribute≈ €625,000
Scalinglinear with circulation

Illustrative, not an offer. Euro yields are lower than dollar yields.

Already working today

Not a prototype — the whole stack is live

A real Monerium IBAN (LHV), real transactions on Gnosis Chain. Open it on your phone and try it.

Croatia lost the kuna in 2023.
We are bringing it back — this time as a euro, on-chain, with the value staying home.

airKUNA DAO · for partners and the community

A digital kuna for the local economy

The concept is open and the technology is proven. The stablecoin is intended to be governed by the airKUNA DAO (in formation) — as a community public good. We are looking for partners, ethical banking partners and collaborators.

Join us — t.me/airkuna_com Email: [email protected] Digital identity (Personhood) →